Advertisements
//
you're reading...
Politics & Law

The Regan-Liu (Fox-CGTN) Debate did have winners


Trish Regan of Fox and Liu Xin of CGTN debated on trade war ‘live’ on TV

The essay title “A debate with no winner” was used to describe the “first time in history” TV live debate between Fox Business Network’s Trish Regan and China Global TV Network (CGTN)’s Liu Xin by The Star Online on June 3. Was there really no winner?

The background to this debate, briefly speaking, is that:

May 14, Regan at her TV show said the U.S. “… has no choice but to wage a trade war against China …” (Strait Times).

May 22, Liu on her own TV program raised several points to rebuke Regan’s criticism, including some data inaccuracy.

May 24, Regan “… defended herself in an 11-minute clip and tweeted an invitation for a debate … ‘You accuse me of being emotional and not knowing my facts — wrong! You name the time and place, and I’ll be there!’ she wrote …” Liu responded and after some exchange of tweets, they agreed to hold a debate ‘live’ on TV on May 30.

May 30, “In the 16 minutes on air, they (Regan in New York and Liu in Beijing) talked about tariffs … but it turned out to be a disappointment” because it looked like a Q&A rather than an emotional debate.

Although most mainstream American and Western media did not report on or just mentioned with very low profile about this debate, “the post of the debate was viewed 130 million times, garnering 24,000 discussions on Weibo…” in China that day alone.

For at least three reasons, China benefited from this debate.

Firstly, it made history as Regan created an opportunity for CGTN to prove that the Chinese media have confidence in airing a debate with a popular American anchor ‘live’ on TV prime time.

Secondly, it shows that China has the talents to engage in debate of this kind with their American counterparts, thus arousing more patriotic feeling among the people on mainland as well as abroad.

Thirdly, Liu has become a “heroine”. Bloomberg reported this:

“… The Chinese have always lived by the saying “better broken jade than intact tile.” This explains why Chinese TV anchor Liu Xin picked out jade earrings and a jade pendant necklace to wear in her much-hyped debate this week on the U.S.-China trade war with Fox anchor Trish Regan.

… The meaning of the jewelry, apparent to millions of Chinese who watched the face-off on social media, but hidden from the American audience: China would rather have no trade deal and uphold its dignity than be humiliated.

… “I wanted to wear pearl earrings at first, but after second thoughts, I decided to wear jade,” Ms. Liu explained in an interview with the Chinese state broadcaster. “‘Better broken jade than intact tile,’ is the spirit we need and want!”

… In Ms. Liu’s mind, the earrings were just the right size — big enough to make her point but not so big and flashy they would have signaled bombast. They also expressed her own individuality: She was speaking for herself rather than her employer…”

And the key point here is: China needs hero and heroine of this type to gather a united front among the economically suffering people so as to fight a trade war against the West, when China does not have an upper hand.

The opinions expressed are those of the author, and not necessarily those of China Daily Mail.

Advertisements

About keith K C Hui

Keith K C Hui is a Chinese University of Hong Kong graduate major in Government and Public Administration and the author of "Helmsman Ruler: China's Pragmatic Version of Plato's Ideal Political Succession System In The Republic" (2013).

Discussion

One thought on “The Regan-Liu (Fox-CGTN) Debate did have winners

  1. The author presents China as victim and US as villain yet China is the persistent thief of American and other nations’ technology. It is China that makes unprovoked attacks using cyberwarfare against other nations. It is China that has declared an objective of global domination. China is villain by any objective measure. Lastly, it is weakness to equate compromise with loss if face. This is a fundamental weakness in the Chinese character and the reason China has become hated in the rest of the world.

    Like

    Posted by John Frymire | June 5, 2019, 10:08 pm

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

Advertisements

Type 407 Training Visas

Get An Australian Diploma

Learn How To Sell Real Estate To Chinese Buyers

Sell Your Real Estate To Chinese Investors

China Daily Mail

China Daily Mail is not affiliated in any way with The China Daily or the government of the People's Republic of China.

Enter your email address to receive an email each time an article is published, or join our RSS feed. 100% FREE.

Want to write for China Daily Mail?

Read "Contributor Guidelines" above to join our team of 68 contributors. Write news or opinion about issues in China, or post photos and video. Promote your own site.

Recent Posts

China Daily Mail Stories Have Been Featured In:

Advertisements
%d bloggers like this: