you're reading...
Global Deals, Politics & Law, Trade & Investment

The U.S. to contain China by an ‘Indo-Pacific’ proposition

The Indo-Pacific Region (picture from CivilDaily)

This BBC video tells you that when the “US President Donald Trump continues his five-nation tour of Asia, one term crops up over and over again. ‘Indo-Pacific region’ is being used to define America’s new geopolitical view of Asia.”

In 2013, Rory Medcalf, Head of National Security College at Australian National University published an essay (almost 5,000 words) at ‘The American Interest’ to tell us that “Australia became the first country formally to name its regions the Indo-Pacific, which suits its two-ocean geography and puts the land down under near the center of things …… The commander of U.S. Pacific Command, Admiral Samuel Locklear, does not even utter Asia-Pacific these days, though he marches to a slightly different beat: He calls it the ‘Indo-Asia-Pacific’ ……

“… it reflects changes in economics, strategic behavior and diplomatic institutions that are having real consequences regardless of who utters the words……. How maps are made and labeled matters too, as Robert Kaplan reminds us, because they affect how the powerful understand the world ……

“… the ‘Indo-Pacific’ label means recognizing that the accelerating economic and security connections between the Western Pacific and the Indian Ocean are creating a single strategic system ……

“… This is no ordinary geographic region but rather a super-region in which sub-regions still matters… While the new name may suit India, the quintessential Indo-Pacific power will be China, and the indispensible one will remain the United States……

“… Continental connections across Asia, like the evolving ‘Indo-Pacific’ corridor comprising Burma and Bangladesh … The Indian Ocean is now the globe’s busiest and most strategically significant trade route, carrying two thirds of world oil shipments and a third of the world’s bulk cargo……

“… This region is Asia-centric, not China-centric, so a China-led order would not wash, even if Beijing were to seek one. Coexistence among the big powers, especially China, India and the United States, will obviously be vital to the super-region’s peace and stability, and a dialogue among the three would be a positive step…….

“… nor can China expect veto power over every exercise, every dialogue, or every act of cooperation among the diverse powers in its new Indo-Pacific setting …… ‘Indo-Pacific’ is both a reflection and an agent of major changes still in train.”

It was a brilliant analysis with splendid foresight for what are about to come. Apparently, having taken the recent development into account, we have at least four points to note assuming this containment could work out.

Firstly, with Australia’s participation and India’s worry about China’s influence over Pakistan, the U.S. is able to expand the horizon from East Asia to Indo-Pacific. This much longer border line can dilute China’s limited resources in managing this region.

Secondly, it will be the US-led alliance with Japan, Australia and India to keep the region in an order which is to be defined by them, not China, in the 21st century. China’s effort in promoting the ‘Asia for Asians’ concept has little chance to materialize. China will be prevented from “moving closer to center stage” of the world arena which is one of Xi Jinping’s visions highlighted in the 19th party congress.

Thirdly, China will pragmatically turn to focus on the westbound Belt and Road Initiative — Central Asia, Asia Minor (Anatolia), East Europe and Africa.

Fourthly, with less economic cultivation by China, I do not know whether this Indo-Pacific region — Japan, ASEAN, Australia, India — would benefit or suffer. I wish that after 50 years, someone would pick up this article at China Daily Mail and ‘tells’ the readers what had happened. Thank you in advance.

The opinions expressed are those of the author, and not necessarily those of China Daily Mail.


About keith K C Hui

Keith K C Hui is a Chinese University of Hong Kong graduate major in Government and Public Administration and the author of "Helmsman Ruler: China's Pragmatic Version of Plato's Ideal Political Succession System In The Republic" (2013).


No comments yet.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s


Type 407 Training Visas

Get An Australian Diploma

Learn How To Sell Real Estate To Chinese Buyers

Sell Your Real Estate To Chinese Investors

China Daily Mail

China Daily Mail is not affiliated in any way with The China Daily or the government of the People's Republic of China.

Enter your email address to receive an email each time an article is published, or join our RSS feed. 100% FREE.

Want to write for China Daily Mail?

Read "Contributor Guidelines" above to join our team of 68 contributors. Write news or opinion about issues in China, or post photos and video. Promote your own site.

Recent Posts

China Daily Mail Stories Have Been Featured In:

%d bloggers like this: