Advertisements
//
you're reading...
Human Rights & Social Issues

Observations from Tibet: Part 2 Chinese rule


Tibet Map

Tibet Map

The Chinese invaded Tibet in 1950 with the Dali Lama fleeing in 1959: I am not going to go into the rights and wrongs of China‘s involvement in Tibet other than to state the Chinese have had cultural and political links with the area for centuries. As the post implies these are observations from my recent trip.

On my first trip to China I was struck by the extent American companies had penetrated the domestic market. Mcdonalds, KFCPepsi, Coke and many other Western brand names were everywhere you looked. In subsequent trips, its seemed to me, that capitalism and the accumulation of money was the new mind-set of the Chinese people and its Government.

I have never felt the communist bogey-man looking over my shoulder at any time during my visits there; sure there were armed soldiers at the entrances to what appeared to be government buildings, standing as stiffly as the starched collars on their shirts, but I always felt relaxed and began to feel that the autocratic dehumanising image of the Chinese Government was a fictional narrative pedalled by the West’s own propaganda machine.

As a result the sense of sinister that I had been expecting on my first couple of visits never materialised. China looked to me as if the massive influx of Western companies and ideas was having a positive effect- whether it is or isn’t is subjective. If you live in the urban areas on the east coast of China you are more likely to be doing better than one of your compatriots living in the more impoverished rural areas.

So it was with great interest to see for myself what the Chinese were up to in one of the more troubled areas of their nation—Tibet. The purpose of the trip was to punish my alcohol starved liver, and visit Everest Base Camp with some close mates. To be honest I didn’t expect Tibet would feel or look any different from any other part of China. I’m not referring to the countryside (it is dramatically different), but to the atmosphere the Chinese are creating by their presence in a country that want to be rid of them.

My first view of Lhasa (Tibet’s capital) was the train station where we were to meet our guide, and it was immediately evident that the Chinese Government were operating at a level that one could only describe as DEFCON FOUR. There were dozens of uniformed police and a heavily armed military presence. We were not allowed to linger for long and were ushered out of the station. The road in an out was closed off by a steel tube boom gate and would only open when the next scheduled departure or arrival was due and even then the passengers who were escorted by the military directly to the departure hall of the train station.

You were not allowed to wander the station grounds or take photos. The military presence was not limited to soldiers on the ground; Lhasa’s skyline would often have military aircraft streaking across it. When our guide collected and bundled us onto a mini-bus, she was insistent that we not take photos of the police, the military or official buildings, because the consequences could mean deportation and the tour company having their licence revoked.

The next morning while standing outside our hotel taking in the sights (and smells) of Lhasa’s old town and smoking a dart, an old Tibetan man approached me; with a warm smile stretched across his face he leaned in close and said in almost whispered tones Dali Lama good!

After being satisfied with my thumbs up walked off happy with his moment of gentle defiance against his Chinese Overlords. Our guide was very knowledgeable about Buddhism and its history and practice, but any talk of the Dali Lama was in hushed tones and I cam to realise how frustrated Harry Potter must have felt about constantly referring to Voldermort as ‘You-Know-Who’ and ‘He-Who-Must-Not-Be-Named.’

There is a sense of sinister control in action; our road trip to Everest was to take us three days so we could acclimatise our sea level respiratory systems to life at 5,000 meters (which is an awful long way up), and in that time our bus was stopped on at least twenty occasions for what was described as log book and speed checks. On four occasions, we all had to exit the bus for passport checks.

It soon became apparent that the stops weren’t about speed, but about authoritarian presence. The police would log the drivers time at each checkpoint and again at the next where they would average the speed out and fine them if they had been going too fast (much like the heavy vehicle checking stations in Australia). It became farcical as the driver would time himself and pull up a hundred meters away (and in full view of authorities) until he felt the time was right to check in, even though the very fact of pulling over was an admission of guilt.

It also did nothing for safety as the driver would then drive like a lunatic between each checkpoint causing nauseating fear, and in the case of one of our number (known as the OC) regular and ear-splitting imitations of Graham Kennedy’s famous (infamous?) crow call.

This was all about controlling the flow of people. On this bus trip I also discovered that the majority of Tibetan’s, unless they had legitimate business interests outside of China, had no travel documents that would allow them to leave Tibet and China—they were prisoners in their own country. All this checking and cross checking hit new heights of absurdity at Base Camp.

After an exhausting day and after two of our number succumbed to altitude sickness, we finally settled down to sleep, only to be woken on numerous occasions by security entering our yak-hair tent hotel and shining flash lights in our faces. I suffer from sleep apnoea and have a CPAP machine hooked up to my face, which I admit can be a startling sight for the uninitiated, and each time they entered they seemed to linger over me for what seemed to be minutes at a time. I had a feeling they would go back to yak-hair-tent-command and inform the shift change to check out the intensive care patient laid out in tent number five.

If one spends any amount of time with Tibetans you will find they are a people who believe they are fighting for cultural survival, a belief that is only confirmed in their minds from official Chinese policies that encourage mixed marriages (1). According to some critics the new emphasis indicates the level to which the Chinese Party state seeks to interfere in people’s private lives and create a disconnect in the cultural lives of the Tibetan people (2).

In China Internet censorship is most evident in the blocking of social media sites like Facebook and Twitter. However, my Internet use on overseas trips is limited to emails and browsing for news items from home, especially the sports updates. I have never really noticed censorship until I started surfing for specific information about Tibet’s history. The links would all be there but any site that even had a hint of controversial content, especially information about the Dali Lama would come up with a page not found error. This became quite frustrating and made me appreciate the level of freedom of information we have available in Australia.

In 2011 China announced a $21 billion US spending program to be spent on 226 major infrastructure projects. This money could be seen everywhere; there was a lot of construction under way, particularly in rail and power infrastructure. Lhasa looked busy and prosperous, due it must be said, to Chinese money and the huge numbers of Chinese tourists. Our guide even admitted that the standard of living had been steadily on the increase in Tibet.

This is not to say that the ever present fear of losing your cultural identity is lessened by large wads of cash being thrown about. Chinese authorities seem to be approaching the ‘Tibet problem’ in a couple of ways. The first with a heavy hand, that is a response to the violence in 2008; this authoritarian approach is a warning that they will not tolerate any nonsense in the future. The second is an economic strategy, one that is sharing the largess of the Chinese economic boom, a strategy that hopes to prove to Tibetans that they are benefiting from being part of China.

I have no idea if it will work and despite the billions in spending and the thousands of Chinese flags fluttering in the rarefied air, there seems to be a palpable anti-Chinese mood amongst Tibetans, a mood highlighted by them showing us pictures of Chinese tourists disrespecting their holy sites and even one horrific picture of a (supposedly) Chinese man eating a baby (3). This picture is apparently the work of a Taiwanese artist, but to assume that this is regular practice in China is wrong and more importantly inflammatory—which is the whole point. The Tibetan opposition to Chinese rule is spinning a narrative that the Chinese are uncouth, ignorant and even barbaric.

China’s desire for unity with Tibet has a long way to go.

Author’s notes:

(1) http://www.washingtonpost.com/world/asia_pacific/china-promotes-mixed-marriages-in-tibet-as-way-to-achieve-unity/2014/08/16/94409ca6-238e-11e4-86ca-6f03cbd15c1a_story.html

(2) http://www.savetibet.org/chinese-party-official-promotes-inter-racial-marriages-in-tibet-to-create-unity/

(3) This picture is easily found on the web and is truly disturbing; along with images of foetus soup it almost make me  wish for a censored net….

Originally Published at: Beyond the Blue Divide— Observations from Tibet: Part 2
 
Advertisements

Discussion

7 thoughts on “Observations from Tibet: Part 2 Chinese rule

  1. China was part of China since the Yuan Dynasty which began in Year 1271. After the founding of the People’s Republic of Chna in 1949, Chinese army started stationing in Tibet in 1951. China never invaded Tibet.

    Editor’s Note: In response to the many emails about the poster Mark Chan, we have confirmed he’s a paid Chinese internet commentator. However, we believe that all people should be allowed to voice their opinions, not just the ones we choose. Therefore, at this stage we will not ban him, but will continue to delete comments that are blatant Chinese propaganda, and totally unrelated to the article.

    Like

    Posted by Mark Chan | September 12, 2014, 12:28 pm
    • Hi Mark, thanks for commenting. I pointed out early in the piece that I was making no judgements about Chinese involvement, and while the word ‘invasion’ is loaded with negative connotations, it is also highly subjective. If you are Tibetan the chances are you feel the stationing of troops in Tibet and resistance to said stationing of troops by local peoples classifies as an invasion. Here in Australia we have a similar issue with white settlement, which of course is rightly viewed by Aboriginal peoples as an invasion. The major perk of the victorious is they get to write the history books.

      Regards
      Phill

      Like

      Posted by Phill | September 12, 2014, 12:49 pm
      • Dear Philip, invasion has a widely accepted meaning of one country using military means against another country. Stationing troops in areas within a country cannot be called an invasion. If I am a Tibetan, I welcome the stationing of PLA troops in Tibet just as I welcome the stationing of PLA troops in Hong Kong starting July 1 1997. If Hawaiians rebel to struggle for independence from the USA and USA sends soldiers to Hawaii to crush the movement, USA cannot be said to be invading Hawaii.

        Editor’s Note: In response to the many emails about the poster Mark Chan, we have confirmed he’s a paid Chinese internet commentator. However, we believe that all people should be allowed to voice their opinions, not just the ones we choose. Therefore, at this stage we will not ban him, but will continue to delete comments that are blatant Chinese propaganda, and totally unrelated to the article.

        Like

        Posted by Mark Chan | September 12, 2014, 1:38 pm
  2. Alas Mark your argument is a logical fallacy. For it to be consistent, people in Tibet would have to identify themselves as Chinese, which the majority don’t. I’m happy for you to think otherwise, and agree to disagree.
    Regards

    Like

    Posted by Phill | September 12, 2014, 3:06 pm

Trackbacks/Pingbacks

  1. Pingback: On Tour: The Great Wall of China | China Daily Mail - October 13, 2014

  2. Pingback: Tibet: Train journey to Lhasa | China Daily Mail - November 24, 2014

  3. Pingback: After long struggle for freedom, Tibetans still seeking justice for Tibet | China Daily Mail - February 19, 2015

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Advertisements

Type 407 Training Visas

Get An Australian Diploma

Learn How To Sell Real Estate To Chinese Buyers

Sell Your Real Estate To Chinese Investors

China Daily Mail

China Daily Mail is not affiliated in any way with The China Daily or the government of the People's Republic of China.

Enter your email address to receive an email each time an article is published, or join our RSS feed. 100% FREE.

Want to write for China Daily Mail?

Read "Contributor Guidelines" above to join our team of 68 contributors. Write news or opinion about issues in China, or post photos and video. Promote your own site.

Recent Posts

China Daily Mail Stories Have Been Featured In:

%d bloggers like this: