Advertisements
//
you're reading...
Politics & Law

A new power structure in Asia: India + China + Japan


Two Japanese Naval warships took part in Malabar 2007 off India's western coast, one of the few such multilateral exercises Japan has ever taken part in symbolising close military cooperation between India and Japan

Two Japanese Naval warships took part in Malabar 2007 off India’s western coast, one of the few such multilateral exercises Japan has ever taken part in symbolising close military cooperation between India and Japan

India under the leadership of Narendra Modi may be able to ease the symbolic tension between China and Japan, and also rise quickly to join them to co-lead a new age of politico-economic vicissitude in East-to-South Asia in the wake of the diminishing influence from the United States.

Geo-economics is the foundation of this emerging India + China + Japan (I+C+J) power structure. India is at the mid-way of the southern Silk Road — the Bangladesh-China-India-Myanmar (BCIM) corridor, one of China’s ambitious mega Silk Road projects to upgrade its Eurasia logistics.

The Indian Ocean is also at the middle of the maritime Silk Route which has the potential to stretch from Dalian in northeastern China to Cape of Good Hope in South Africa, about half of the globe diameter.

For a state with 1.26 billion population (which will outnumber China’s 1.35 billion very soon) to thrive, Modi who has hands-on co-operation experience with China for steering economic growth in Gujarat knows that India must reach out to foster export, including the valuable human resources such as the expertise in software programming. If and only if he has brought home plenteous growths can he overpower the sectarian and regional challenges at home so as to launch all sorts of socio-political reforms. Modi will make the best use of this geo advantage to facilitate India’s international trades within and outside Asia.

Equipped with 120 nuclear heads and three aircraft carriers to safeguard the security of the Indian Ocean, India is a heavy weight power in South Asia. Despite its military might, however, in East Asia, India is not threatening in any way and appears to be impartial between China and Japan. India’s neutrality and presence could play a positive role to mediate any possible tension between the two leading giants, thus bringing forward a triple-win situation. If China’s export-led and infrastructure-backed economic growth model is going to be duplicated in India successfully in the coming two decades, India as a huge market for cranes, electricity grids, infrastructure knowhow and finally all sorts of consumer goods will transform itself into an influential player in East-to-South Asia on all fronts.

India’s proactive engagement into East Asia has been salient. In as early as 2007, a study group was agreed among the states to establish an ASEAN + 6 Free Trade Area (10 ASEAN members plus India, China, Japan, South Korea, Australia and New Zealand). The economic ministers of these 16 states met in Brunei August 2013 to confirm their serious intention in finalizing this Regional Comprehensive Economic Partnership (RCEP) by 2015, a concept of free trade zone from Indian Ocean to the West Pacific covering 3.35 billion people and 27% of global GDP.

Whether this RCEP can be cemented will partly depend on New Delhi’s ability (and also Modi’s charisma) to turn the East Asian nations into a phalanx to cope with economic ups and downs. Another I+C+J co-operation can be noted from the establishment of the Recommended Transit Corridor (IRTC) in 2012 among China, India, Japan and South Korea to co-ordinate navy escort for deterring pirates’ attacks on commercial vessels. In the private sector, Tata Group is one of the pioneers to promote business synergy for these three countries by manufacturing Land Rover cars with Chery in China and providing 3G telecommunication services in hand with Docomo.

In less than three weeks after Modi’s inauguration, Chinese Foreign Minister Wang Yi rushed to New Delhi to tell him: “Through years of negotiation, we have come to an agreement on the basics of a boundary agreement, and we are prepared to reach a final settlement.” Nowadays, it is simple common sense that what government leaders seek for is eminence while entry into war can be enormity. By the time Modi has finally hammered a deal to end the decades-long India border row with China, it will become an unprecedented show case for all other nations to realise that immense common commercial interests can really solve territorial disputes.

Despite continual provocations by bellicose politicians and jingoistic analysts since Shinzo Abe came back to power in 2012, the two competing East Asian nations have actually never stopped holding bilateral semi-official talks. From the 2013 meeting between Japanese business leaders led by Fujio Cho of Toyota and the Chinese Commerce Minister, to Beijing’s warm welcome for the incumbent Tokyo governor Yoichi Masuzoe in April 2014, and then the friendly discussion in May between Masahiko Komura (vice-president of Japan’s ruling Liberal Democratic Party) and Zhang Dejiang (the third ranking member of the Politburo Standing Committee and the chairman of the National People’s Congress), low profile but pragmatic communication between China and Japan has been carried on persistently.

Knowing that it will never be easy for the White House to garner sufficient support from the general public to send American soldiers to die for several uninhabited islands in Asia, indicating that a superpower shift is inevitable, both China and Japan are sagaciously making use of the islands in dispute as the excuse to compete for the new game setter status of the region. With reference to the “India-China agreement”, if could be historically achieved, Tokyo and Beijing would eventually work out a compromise diplomatically to set the new “rules of Asian game” for the distribution of political powers and financial interests, and then an agreement for settling the spat over the islands.

If making concession is necessary, to better serve Japan’s national interests, Tokyo would probably do it for securing a deal with Beijing and New Delhi rather than with Washington. That is perhaps why Obama’s April visit could not yield a trade pact home, even though he pledged the inclusion of the disputed islands into the Japan-U.S. Security Treaty under Article 5.

All these developments have laid down a solid framework for the rise of the new I+C+J power structure. Without the relatively complicated relation between the Christians and Muslims, the atheist Chinese and Japanese who are culturally compatible with the Hindu Indians will not hesitate to seize the opportunity to collaborate so as to set their own rules of a new multi-polar politico-economic game in Asia.

Keith K C Hui is a HK-based commentator on China and international politics and the author of Helmsman Ruler: China’s Pragmatic Version of Plato’s Ideal Political Succession System in The Republic
 
The opinions expressed are those of the author, and not necessarily those of China Daily Mail
 
First Published: Eurasia review – A New Power Structure In Asia: India+China+Japan – Analysis
 

 

Advertisements

About keith K C Hui

Keith K C Hui is a Chinese University of Hong Kong graduate major in Government and Public Administration and the author of "Helmsman Ruler: China's Pragmatic Version of Plato's Ideal Political Succession System In The Republic" (2013).

Discussion

7 thoughts on “A new power structure in Asia: India + China + Japan

  1. One more dream of Chinese Han ruling of Asia with a India twist and Japan bending down … The reality, however is quite different: India trust Japan partnership to build its future growth and to balance out Chinese aggressions throughout Asia. Yes, “Chinese Foreign Minister Wang Yi rushed to New Delhi” first, but India knew the trick and saw the newly released map showing Indian territories as part of China – too many lies, hard to hide them all. Meanwhile, Japan and India already pursue a new power structure in Asia with Australia, New Zealand, the Philippines, Vietnam and few more South East Asian nations… all commit to confront Chinese territorial expansionism, militarily and fully capable of breaking Chinese economy down with maritime blockade from Indian ocean through South China Sea and Japan Sea.

    Like

    Posted by tse yang | July 10, 2014, 8:40 pm
  2. After reading his article on here, I’m no longer interested in his book. What a joke. It seems he was bought by the Chinese polite-propaganda-bureau?

    Tse Yang, however, appears to not only have a brain, but uses it to withstand bribery attempts by the Chinese.

    Like

    Posted by Leslie | July 11, 2014, 12:43 am
  3. For various reasons some people dislike Han Chinese and China’s rise in Asia. However, if world peace and smooth globalization are what we want for our future generations and all mankind, what we need to do is think how to seek for a fair deal, not to use such words as “all commit to confront”, “breaking Chinese economy down” and the like. Personal attack such as “he was bought by …” does not help, too. Why do they keep on beating the war drum to induce combat, death, destruction ……? Why don’t we promote co-operation so that peoples in India, Sri Lanka, Bangladesh, Cambodia, Laos, Vietnam, the Philippines and southwestern China can have a share of prosperity? Why don’t they hope that Asia can be managed by Asian countries rather than led by the West? If the Chinese economy collapsed, do they think the whole world would benefit from it? If you agree with them, please kindly write to teach me.

    Like

    Posted by keith K C Hui | July 11, 2014, 12:19 pm
  4. China has a bad reputation about grabbing lands of neighboring countries including India and Japan. No one can trust China (including USA0 because one of the Premier once says that China has no friends (It means we all are enemies of China). In the world of politics we count every words what rulers are using. You can not gack to thousand year map what china use to hold. India used to hold land upto Iran, India never claim those land. China want multi billions dollars of business with India and also wants Indian land. I am glead we have got strong Prime Minister Mr. Modi. He knows how to settle accounts.

    Like

    Posted by Rajasaab | July 12, 2014, 12:17 am

Trackbacks/Pingbacks

  1. Pingback: China seeks to expand free trade area to South Asia in quest to dominate all Asia | China Daily Mail - November 29, 2014

  2. Pingback: China concerned that India shows no clear interest in the New Silk Road initiative | China Daily Mail - August 10, 2015

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Advertisements

Type 407 Training Visas

Get An Australian Diploma

Learn How To Sell Real Estate To Chinese Buyers

Sell Your Real Estate To Chinese Investors

China Daily Mail

China Daily Mail is not affiliated in any way with The China Daily or the government of the People's Republic of China.

Enter your email address to receive an email each time an article is published, or join our RSS feed. 100% FREE.

Want to write for China Daily Mail?

Read "Contributor Guidelines" above to join our team of 68 contributors. Write news or opinion about issues in China, or post photos and video. Promote your own site.

Recent Posts

China Daily Mail Stories Have Been Featured In:

%d bloggers like this: