Advertisements
//
you're reading...
Politics & Law

Mao Thought conspicuously missing from Xinhua report in China; is it dumped?


An actor (far right) plays Mao Zedong in a battle re-enactment at a tourist attraction in Yanan, Shaanxi, his base in the 1930s

Mao Zedong Thought Conspicuously Missing

SCMP reports: “The omission of Mao Zedong’s name from a recent Xinhua statement has triggered speculation as to whether the Communist Party’s 18th congress, which begins on November 8, will make a historic decision about how much emphasis to accord one of the party’s founding fathers, as the practical impact of Mao’s legacy on the party wanes.

“The statement, issued after the party’s 24-member Politburo met on Monday, made references to President Hu Jintao, his predecessor Jiang Zemin, and Deng Xiaoping, the architect of China’s transformational ‘reform and opening up’ policy, but did not mention Mao. The statement also said the congress would revise the party constitution to incorporate ‘significant’ theories.”

It was in reference to amendments to China’s Constitution. What was the exact wording in the statement where Mao Thought was missing?

The statement says, “The whole Party shall unswervingly uphold the great banner of socialism with Chinese characteristics, further implement the Scientific Outlook on Development under the guidance of Deng Xiaoping Theory and the important thought of Three Represents…” in which Mao Zedong Thought is conspicuously missing.

Mao Thought Has Long Been Omitted in CPC Jargon

However, this wording became conspicuous long ago when Hu Jintao said that in his 2010 New Year’s message on New Year Eve. His exact wording was, “In the upcoming new year, we will unswervingly uphold the great banner of socialism with Chinese characteristics, further implement the Scientific Outlook on Development under the guidance of Deng Xiaoping Theory and the important thought of Three Represents,…”

Note that some parts of the statement and Hu’s speech are identical.

In the CCP’s (Chinese Communist Party) and China’s constitutions, the guiding ideologies are Marxism-Leninism, Mao Zedong Thought, Deng Xiaoping Theory and the important thought of Three Represents. However, in Hu’s message, Marxism-Leninism and Mao Zedong Thought are conspicuously missing.

Such omission was repeated in Hu’s speech at the tea party of the CPPCC National Committee the next day. Interestingly, it was soon repeated with identical wording in Politburo Standing Committee member Li Changchun’s speech at an important meeting of CCP’s propaganda leaders on January 4, 2010 and in the Communiqué of the 5th plenary session of the 17th CCP Central Discipline Inspection Commission on  January 13, 2010. In Hu’s speech at the fifth symposium on work in Tibet on January 22, he also repeated what he said and regarded it as the guiding ideology in doing work in Tibet then and in the future.

The wording has been so frequently repeated by high officials and in CCP documents that it has already become a CCP jargon.

However, does such omission mean that the CCP is really going to dump Mao Zedong Thought?

It does not seem so, Chinese media, books, movies, TV series have remained filled with praises of Mao since then.

In fact, three months before Hu’s New Year message in mid September 2009, the slogan “Persist in regarding as our guidance Marxism-Leninism, Mao Zedong Thought, Deng Xiaoping Theory and the important thought of Three Represents and further, thoroughly implement the Scientific Outlook on Development” was the 5th of the 50 slogans for the 60th National Day celebration given by CCP and State Council authorities to the media.

SCMP says, “Analysts are divided on whether the omission was an indication that the party leadership had reached a consensus on Mao’s controversial theories.”

However it also says, “The party announced yesterday the planned naming of four halls in the Mausoleum of Mao Zedong in Tiananmen Square after revolutionary places related to Mao.

“The places are Jinggangshan and Yanan, which were Red Army headquarters; Shaoshan, Mao’s birthplace; and Zunyi, where Mao was appointed top leader of the Red Army.”

Other founders of the People’s Republic may have a share in the names “Jinggangshan” and “Yanan”, but “Shaoshan” and “Zunyi” exclusively belong to Mao.

That obviously gave us the message, that the Party will not dump Mao.

Why Such Omission then?

Most people outside China now believe that China is pursuing capitalism and that if the CCP wants continuity in China’s development, it has to give up Marxism-Leninism and Mao Zedong thought. But the CCP insists that it is pursuing socialism with Chinese characteristics though there is in China now nearly everything that is regarded by traditional Marxists and Leninists and Maoists as capitalist: private enterprises and share markets.

The CCP now attaches great importance to harmony. In the 50 60th National Day slogans, the word “harmony” appears 5 times. However, can Marxism-Leninism and Mao Zedong Thought give the CCP guidance in harmony with Deng Xiaoping Theory and Three Represents?

Mao Zedong Thought Harmful to Reform and Had to Be Omitted

Mao Zedong Thought advocates class struggle, egalitarianism, cultural revolutions against capitalist-roaders and thorough denunciation of Confucianism. It is, therefore, diametrically opposed to the CCP’s Scientific Outlook on Development that pursues capitalism and Confucianist harmony. For a long time, conservatives in the CCP have used Mao Zedong Thought to oppose reform and opening up. How can CCP leaders justify the implementation of their Scientific Outlook on Development and pursuit of harmony if Mao Zedong Thought remains their guiding ideology?

The CCP has to discard Mao Zedong Thought but cannot do so because it believes that discarding Mao Zedong Thought will deprive it of the legitimacy of its monopoly of political power. What it can do now is but to omit it. Omission of Mao Zedong Thought in many of Hu’s speeches clearly indicates the CCP’s intention to discard it by omission. It would be awkward if Marxism-Leninism remains. People will suspect that Hu had some problems with Mao Zedong Thought which after all has not been removed from the CCP’s and state’s constitutions. As a result, Hu has to omit Marxism-Leninism along with Mao Zedong Thought.

Mao Zedong Thought, if not removed from the CCP’s and state’s constitutions, will remain a lurking peril for China and the world. It may be exploited by enemies of the reform to oppose the reform and bring chaos like the Cultural Revolution to the country. It may cause a Maoist CCP leader to be engaged in a cold or even world war against the West.

What about Marxism? Is It Also a Threat?

Marxism is the basis of the CCP’s ideology. Leninism, Mao Zedong Thought, Deng Xiaoping Theory and Three Represents are all derived from Marxism. If the CCP has discarded Marxism, it can no longer call itself a communist party. The CCP still faithfully advocates Marxism now. In its media, it repeatedly urges its members to study Marxism.

Marx called on the proletariat (the working class) to carry out a revolution to overthrew capitalism and establish communism. Is this not a threat to the capitalist West? It is also a threat to the CCP’s current actual pursuit of capitalism. However, this is not a problem for the CCP or the West now.

Three Represents Makes Marxism Compatible with Capitalism

The first Represent, that the CCP represents the requirements of the development of the advanced productive force, touches the basic of the basics of the Marxist theory. According to Marxist economics, the most important factors are the productive force and production relations. The productive force keeps on developing and requires the production relations to suit it. If the production relations do not suit the requirements, it will hinder the development of the advanced productive force and should be replaced by more advanced production relations that suit the requirements.

The most fundamental Marxist principle for communists is, therefore, that communists should represent the requirements of the development of the advanced productive force. According to Marx, they, therefore, should carry out a revolution to put all means of production (enterprises) under public ownership as required by the development of the advanced productive force, so that the state can plan the production in accordance with the needs of the society.

However, Marx could not foresee that public ownership and planned economy were proved inefficient by the practice in the Soviet Union, China and other countries, and that in China the development of the advanced productive force requires China to dump communism and pursue capitalism now.

The new theory of the Three Represents enables the CCP to dump communism and pursue capitalism while remaining a Marxist party. As there is no definition of the requirements of the development of the advanced productive force, when capitalism is to be dumped in the future and creativism or supermodernism or whatever is required, the CCP can immediately dump capitalism so as to represent the new requirements. By so doing, will the CCP be able to maintain its rule forever?

Mao Zedong Thought Remains CCP’s Achilles’ Heel

Mao Zedong Thought is in diametrical conflict with Deng Xiaoping Theory and the Three Represents. It upholds the rule by workers and peasants and neglects academic education. It believes that three months’ medical training is enough for a doctor. The poor management of China’s economy by uneducated people in 1976 after Zhou Enlai’s death and Deng Xiaoping’s fall brought Chinese economy to the verge of collapse. Deng Xiaoping Theory and the Three Represents, however, advocate that CCP leaders should be well educated and place great emphasis on academic education. If Mao Zedong thought is still regarded as the guiding ideology in CCP’s and China’s Constitutions, and if Mao’s portrait still looks down on Tiananmen Square, certainly people who have not been sufficiently benefited by the reform may use Mao Zedong Thought to oppose reform, opening-up and the thought of Three Represents.

Worship of Mao Hot at Present

Mao has now been deified among quite a few workers and peasants. Over the past few years, sacrificial alters for worship of Mao become conspicuous in quite a few families. According to a survey in 2008, in 40 cities including Beijing, Shanghai, Guangzhou and Wuhan, families who had Mao’s statutes or portraits for worship accounted for 11.5% of the total number of families there, exceeding by far those who worshipped Buddha, God of Wealth or local god of the land. For those who are indignant against the widening rich-poor gap and the uncertainty caused by the reform and opening-up in their lives, Mao comes back as a symbol in their minds that embodies justice, fairness, and equality between the rich and the poor. When corruption is rampant, people are especially indignant that rich people got much of their wealth by foul means instead of fair.

Bo Xilai exploited the surge of Maoism to launch his sing-red campaign and gained great popularity, but reformists regard it as a great threat. The power struggle that brought down the powerful conservatives represented by Bo was full of tricks and intrigues that I will write a book about.

People who think that China can maintain its tremendous growth rate, and finally surpass the United States, should not forget that Maoism is an insurmountable obstacle to reform and opening up. It may stop China’s growth at any time in the future if the CCP does not discard Mao Zedong Thought. The omission of Mao Zedong Thought is only the beginning.

However, I doubt whether Mao Thought will be removed from CCP Constitution this time as Xinhua statement only said “the congress would revise the party constitution to incorporate ‘significant’ theories” instead of removing something.

Certainly, we hope Mao Thought will be removed, but I do not think that the reformists are strong enough to do so now.

Advertisements

About chankaiyee2

Author of the book "Tiananmen's Tremendous Achievements" about how with the help of Tiananmen Protests, talented scholars with moral integrity seized power in the Party and state and brought prosperity to China. The second edition of the book will be published within a few days to mark the 25th anniversary of Tiananmen Protests All the parts in the first edition remain in the second edition with a few changes due to information available later and better understanding. There are also some changes for improvements of style. The new parts are Chapters 12-19 on events in China after the first edition was published: The fierce power struggle for succession between reformists and conservatives; Xi Jinping winning all elders’ support during his mysterious disappearance for 2 weeks in early September, 2012; and Xi Jinping Cyclone. Chan Kai Yee's new book: SPACE ERA STRATEGY: The Way China Beats The US An eye-opening book that tells the truth how the US is losing to China. The US is losing as it adopts the outdated strategy of Air-Sea Battle while China adopts the space era strategy to pursue integrated space and air capabilities: It is losing due to its diplomacy that has given rise to Russian-Chinese alliance. US outdated strategy has enabled China to catch up and surpass the US in key weapons: Hypersonic weapons (HGV) that Pentagon regards as the weapon that will dominate the world in the future. Aerospaceplane in China’s development of space-air bomber that can engage enemy anywhere in the world within an hour and destroy an entire aircraft carrier battle group within minutes. Anti-satellite (ASAT) weapons, anti-ASAT weapons, stealth aircrafts, drones, AEW&C, etc. The book gives detailed descriptions of China’s weapon development based on information mainly from Chinese sources that the author monitors closely. U.S. Must Not Be Beaten by China! China is not a democracy. Its political system cannot prevent the emergence of a despotic leader or stop such a leader when he begins to bring disasters to people. A few decades ago, Mao Zedong, the worst tyrant in world history did emerge and bring disasters to Chinese people. He wanted to fight a nuclear war to replace capitalism with communism but could not bring nuclear holocaust to world people as China was too weak and poor at that time. If a despot like Mao Zedong emerges when China has surpassed the US in military strength, world people will suffer the misery experienced by Chinese people in Mao era. China surpassing the US in GDP is not something to worry about as China has the heavy burden to satisfy its huge population, but China surpassing the US in military strength will be world people’s greatest concern if China remains an autocracy. US people are of much better quality than Chinese people. What they lack is a wise leader to adopt the correct strategy and diplomacy and the creative ways to use its resources in developing its military capabilities. I hope that with the emergence of a great leader, the US can put an end to its decline and remain number one in the world. China, US, space era strategy, air-sea battle, space-air bomber, arms race, weapon development, chan kai yee

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Advertisements

Get An Australian Diploma

China Daily Mail

China Daily Mail is not affiliated in any way with The China Daily or the government of the People's Republic of China.

Enter your email address to receive an email each time an article is published, or join our RSS feed. 100% FREE.

Want to write for China Daily Mail?

Read "Contributor Guidelines" above to join our team of 68 contributors. Write news or opinion about issues in China, or post photos and video. Promote your own site.

Recent Posts

China Daily Mail Stories Have Been Featured In:

Advertisements
%d bloggers like this: