Advertisements
//
you're reading...
Politics & Law

China must learn that size only gets you so far


Great Hall Of The People

For more than three decades, China has been courting its neighbours to the south. Enticing the countries of the Association of Southeast Asian Nations into closer cooperation has been a top goal of Chinese foreign policy since the days of Deng Xiaoping, and it has brought great rewards.

In 2010 the two sides entered into a free-trade agreement that created one of the world’s largest integrated markets. But now, with its aggressive attitude on demarcation lines in the South China Sea, China risks throwing it all away. Why?

Up to about two years ago, everything, including diplomatic affairs and trade, seemed to be developing swimmingly between China and its southern neighbours. Even with Vietnam, China’s opponent in a brief border-war in 1979, relations had improved markedly. Leaders in Hanoi were looking to Beijing both for advice on how to run a one-party Communist state and on how to reform its economy into a market-driven engine of growth. Some Southeast Asian countries with large Chinese minorities were, for the first time, beginning to see these groups as an opportunity in dealing with China, rather than as a threat.

Then things changed markedly. At a 2010 regional forum in Hanoi, the usually equipoised Chinese Foreign Minister Yang Jiechi fumed at his Southeast Asian hosts for their mutual solidarity and their perceived attempts to enlist U.S. support in their long-brewing disagreements over who had sovereignty over portions of the South China Sea.

“There is one basic difference among us,” Yang is supposed to have said. “China is a big state and you are smaller countries.” He infuriated not only the Vietnamese, but the truly big countries that were present, such as Indonesia. I met with a senior Indonesian policy maker in Jakarta soon afterward. “We are a serious country,” he bristled. “We will not be treated like this.”

Since then, China’s relations with Southeast Asia have been sinking fast. There have been clashes at sea between China and two other South China Sea claimants, Vietnam and the Philippines. Some countries are looking again at the content of the free-trade agreement, feeling that it gives China too much influence. Chinese attempts to use its power within the weaker ASEAN countries ― Cambodia and Burma ― to prevent a united front within the organisation have backfired badly. The bigger countries now suspect that China is out to break up ASEAN (if given half a chance). In spite of recent Chinese restraint (at least verbally), relations seem to go from bad to worse.

What is at stake is not only a settlement of the disputed claims to zones of maritime control in the South China Sea (and the rights to exploit the resources that lie beneath them). It is the whole future relationship between China and the region. Even as the U.S. is encouraging negotiations and peaceful settlements, it is strengthening its regional role. Every big ASEAN country has drawn considerably closer to Washington over the past year or so. China’s policy has therefore been almost entirely self-defeating in terms of its long-term interests.

Why is China acting the way it does? The underwater resources at stake are deemed to be considerable and crucial to China’s future development.

Nationalist public opinion in China demands a tough stance on territorial issues, as the conflict with Japan over the East China Sea islands has also recently shown. There is genuine anger in Beijing about ASEAN’s efforts to seek U.S. support and about what is seen as an unwillingness to negotiate based on China’s demands. Some Chinese naval officers are bucking to test China’s newly gained capabilities for offshore naval deployment.

But at the root of the problem lies exactly what Yang alluded to in Hanoi. Because of a heritage that goes back to the deeper past, China regards its position within the region as unique. It is the big country and other countries must treat it as such. This does not preclude meaningful negotiations or a respect for the sovereignty of others. But it does imply a position for China that puts its views and its claims in a different category than those of other states. Especially in the long run, it is an attitude that will not serve China well.

China’s approach to ASEAN on the South China Sea disputes points to a country whose diplomacy is still remarkably immature and not ready to take on a regional leadership role. It does not slowly integrate its neighbours and putative partners into a cooperative constellation of states that may serve China’s interests and that also demonstrably serves the interests of others. This is what the U.S. did with its main allies after World War II. Instead, the PRC’s leaders seem hell-bound on looking after its own interests and challenging those of its neighbours, from Korea to Myanmar. This policy will not win China its much coveted regional role, not to mention a position as a global great power.

China’s demands on the South China Sea are not even clear. Officially the country claims “historical rights” over a vaguely defined section of ocean that covers most of the maritime regions to its south. That claim is often symbolised by a nine- dashed line on maritime maps, which would, in effect, recognise almost all of the South China Sea as Chinese. This is, to put it mildly, a nonsensical position that will not stand under international law. Most serious Chinese diplomats know this (though I am sometimes shocked by how many do not).

The best thing that China could do now would be to define its actual demands. This would include coming to terms with the fact that the country, at best, can only lay claim to a 12-nautical-mile zone around the islets. According to the U.N. Convention on the Law of the Sea, small islands that cannot sustain human habitation do not have the right to a 200 mile exclusive economic zone. So instead of the “right” to all of the South China Sea, which many Chinese think they claim, the real maximum demand will be much more modest. This should sober minds in Beijing and elsewhere.

In the meantime, China and the other countries should adopt the new Indonesian proposal for an interim international code of conduct in the South China Sea. It calls for concrete confidence building and conflict prevention measures, including a reduction of military activity in the region. For the time being, that may be as close to calm as we can get within these troubled waters.

By Odd Arne Westad (professor of history at the London School of Economics and Political Science and the author of the just-published “Restless Empire: China and the World Since 1750.”)
 
Bloomberg
 
Advertisements

About Craig Hill

General Manager at Craig Hill Training Services * Get an Australian diploma by studying in your own country * Get an Australian diploma using your overseas study and work experience * Diplomas can be used for work or study in Australia and other countries. * For more information go to www.craighill.net

Discussion

7 thoughts on “China must learn that size only gets you so far

  1. Absolutely! A thousand times yes! No one knows Beijing’s goals because Beijing doesn’t even know them. It’s Asian pride with permeates even Christians and Church leaders in Taiwan. I don’t say this to insert my own agenda, but, like it or not, the “forgiveness” and “lead through servanthood” ideas in Christianity were forced on the West (it’s a bitter-sweet) for two thousand years. This very issue is why it’s better to grow up with Christianity floating around the culture than in a nation that completely doesn’t understand the concept of forgiveness and redemption. I’m not trying to twist anyone’s arm into believing Jesus, just saying that the Bible hasn’t been all that bad to us in the West.

    Having said that, we need to be wise to China’s aggression, honest about the fact that it’s born in shame and unforgiveness, yet be patient, trying to help them learn. The best way for America to solve this problem is for Chinese Christians INSIDE America to crack-down on Asian “Shame” and stop pussy-footing around with the issue. If Chinese culture can understand forgiveness and that “it’s good to lose face” among Chinese Christians in America, then non-Christians in China might calm down and “love their neighbors as themselves”.

    If my comment offends anyone, please explain why so I can understand you. My intent is to help people understand each other, not to offend.

    Like

    Posted by Jesse Steele | October 23, 2012, 11:26 pm
    • China reportedly has 70 million Christians, though apparently all references to Jesus and God have been deleted from the Bible. Beijing is also in direct conflict with the Vatican, claiming the Pope does not have the right to refuse to ordain cardinals that the CCP has selected. So Beijing just ordains them without the Pope’s approval…

      Like

      Posted by China Daily Mail | October 24, 2012, 12:07 am
  2. That’s with the Roman Catholic Church. Remember, Beijing doesn’t object to Jesus, they object to “other powers”. They don’t want the Pope “meddling” in their country. If the Pope can appoint a priest then he can appoint a priest who is a spy—that’s their concern, I think. There are other Christian networks, with WAY less centralized power that we are accustomed to Christian organizations having in the West, that Beijing pretty much lets run free… because they keep small and they have Bibles in China that the government allows that refer to Jesus.

    Beijing is learning that Jesus’ Kingdom is NOT of this world and that Jesus does not oppose Beijing. So, the Communists’ objections tend to remain with large denominations and top-heavy administrations, with appointments being made from outside China… such as the Catholic Church and American Missions agencies. Looking at their decisions, it seems Beijing views it more as a national security issue, not an ideology or religious fight, which makes them different from the old Russian Communism.

    If the Church is local and it’s administration is small—as it should be, Biblically speaking—Beijing probably won’t object… probably.

    Like

    Posted by Jesse Steele | October 24, 2012, 10:44 am

Trackbacks/Pingbacks

  1. Pingback: Further signs of a strengthening Chinese economy « China Daily Mail - October 24, 2012

  2. Pingback: China snubs SE Asia push for South China Sea deal « China Daily Mail - October 30, 2012

  3. Pingback: Decoding China’s core interests – an analysis. « China Daily Mail - November 8, 2012

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Advertisements

Get An Australian Diploma

China Daily Mail

China Daily Mail is not affiliated in any way with The China Daily or the government of the People's Republic of China.

Enter your email address to receive an email each time an article is published, or join our RSS feed. 100% FREE.

Want to write for China Daily Mail?

Read "Contributor Guidelines" above to join our team of 68 contributors. Write news or opinion about issues in China, or post photos and video. Promote your own site.

Recent Posts

China Daily Mail Stories Have Been Featured In:

Advertisements
%d bloggers like this: